ChaveryResearch Companion

Which study design you are actually running

Observational or interventional; and if observational, which direction time runs in.

Observational — you watch and record; you change nothing. A *cross-sectional* study measures everything at one point in time. A *cohort* study follows people forward and sees who develops the outcome. A *case-control* study starts from people who already have the outcome and looks backward for exposures.

Interventional — you do something and see what happens. A *randomised controlled trial* allocates participants to groups by chance. A *before-and-after* study measures the same people twice, with your intervention in between.

Why it matters

The design determines what you may claim. A cross-sectional study can show that two things occur together; it cannot show that one caused the other, because you did not observe which came first. It also determines the statistics: two independent groups are compared differently from the same group measured twice, and using the wrong one inflates or destroys your significance.

An example

Same topic, four designs:

• Cross-sectional — measure vitamin D in 200 nursing students once, and report the prevalence of deficiency.

• Case-control — take 60 students with deficiency and 60 without, and compare their sun exposure.

• Cohort — follow 200 students for a year and see who becomes deficient.

• Trial — randomise 100 deficient students to supplementation or no supplementation, and compare levels at six months.

Common mistakes

Read next

Chavery Research Companion applies this to your own study: it asks the questions in plain language, checks the assumptions against your data, recommends the test, and writes the sentence that reports it. Start free — planning and the master chart cost nothing.